We really appreciate when customers go out of their way to talk about Lowell's, either in person or online. Thanks, Erik.
[where: 111 Mechanic St, Lexington, KY 40507]
Let's make your car better.
A few years ago, Chili's really ticked me off.
Because of our careers, my wife and I ate out a lot. (We still do.) And Chili's had my favorite meal, a dish they called 'Margarita Grilled Tuna'. I had eaten it every week or so for some 5 or 6 years.
Then it disappeared from the menu. (Editorial comment: Booooooo!)
I tried to stay away from Chili's in protest, but my wife dragged me back in. Eventually, I found some other things I liked eating there, but nothing ever compared to that tuna…
Chili's continued to be part of our regular rotation of restaurants after our son was born. And, with his magnetic personality, several wait-staff members would go out of their way to come visit with him. The greeters and managers began recognizing us as well.
When we walked in last night, the greeter proclaimed "There's my buddy! How's Mr. Carson tonight?" and exchanged high-fives with him. She took us to our 'regular' booth (in reality, we have eaten all over the restaurant, but we do prefer the booths).
Alex, who wasn't our server last night, came over and double-high-fived Carson, and talked with him for a few minutes.
Neil, the general manager, came over and gave him a big hug and called him by name. He also brought a Chili's ball cap, and gave it to Carson to wear. On previous visits, Neil has also brought us a complementary slushie and has introduced Carson to Neil's own daughter.
Last night, he asked if he could take Carson's picture for the office wall, because "seeing Carson only once a week just wasn't enough". 15 minutes later, he brought out a 4×6 print for us to keep. Carson was beaming. (My scan doesn't do the original photo justice.)
On the way out, Carson gave Neil another big hug and waved goodbye enthusiastically to the other staff members.
Eating out with a toddler can be a challenging experience. At Chili's, the staff's willingness to engage Carson has helped keep him occupied and entertained. That's a big bonus for parents like us.
But what makes the experience truly special is the sense that we are among family and friends. Carson is greeted with genuine joy by the Chili's staff. They are happy to have us come back. And, as a result, we are happy to go back.
For Carson, these kinds of interactions have made Chili's one of only two restaurants he knows by name: "Chih-wee's". (The other is "Chick-foo-way".)
Can I recommend every Chili's based on our experiences? No. Over at the Brand Autopsy blog, John Moore openly wondered why Chili's needs to exist.
But I can heartily recommend our Chili's. Even without the tuna…
A Few Lessons for Business
[where: 2851 Richmond Rd, Lexington, KY 40509]
I like Dockers pants. They are easy to find, and their sizes are reliable and fit me well. I'm a particular fan of their "Golf Pant" – not because I play golf, but because they have a few bonuses I like: a 'shirt-gripper' waistband (to keep shirts tucked in) and extra interior pockets (to keep my stuff easy-to-find). Also, I don't have to iron them — a big time-saver.
So I visited a store earlier this week to look for them. But the Dockers section had a lot of new, unfamiliar names for their pants: 'The Broker Chino' and 'The Lincoln Pant'. The Golf Pant was nowhere to be found…
I was in a hurry, so I grabbed the ones which looked closest to the style I liked: The Lincoln Pant. Same price, same style. Just a different name…
Or so I thought.
The next morning, I put these pants on, and noticed to my annoyance that the shirt-gripper was missing. My brain was filled with images of me constantly stuffing my shirts back into the back of my pants.
Then I went to load my stuff: change, cell phone, pens, glasses case, cash, and such. No interior pockets, so all my stuff was swimming in there together. Plus, the pockets aren't as deep as they used to be. Another annoyance, especially when I'm driving or sitting and stuff spills out of my pockets.
It seems that the Lincoln pants are a recession version of the Golf pants: All style, no substance. By skimping on a few square inches of cloth and that little rubbery strip around the waist, the pants have lost most of what made them worth buying in the first place.
Lessons for Business
Times are tough for a lot of businesses, and the desire for cost-cutting is understandable.
But when a business chooses to scrimp on the very things their customers value, they make things even tougher for themselves. Ultimately, such businesses wither as customers see no particular reason to patronize them.
Did Dockers offend me? No. I bought a decent (but not special) pair of pants. But by charging the same price for a blander product, they did create a Zero experience and gave me the impression that they just stopped trying to meet my needs.
So, by saving costs on these "recession pants", Dockers will likely lose a customer. That's a steep price for the few pennies saved.
What if, instead, Dockers had leaned into the recession winds, and invested a few extra cents? Maybe heavier cloth, more pockets, or some cool innovation. What if they had chosen to stand out from all of the competitors who also cut costs? What if they treated the recession as an opportunity to grow, rather than a threat requiring fiscal tightening? What if they had chosen to change things instead of being changed by them?
It might have cost them a little more in these hard times, but it would have increased my devotion to their brand, perhaps for several years.
What is that worth?
[where: 1988 Pavilion Way, Lexington, KY 40509]
The meal was fine.
But I left my glasses at the table.
When we sat down, I distinctly remembered setting them near the edge of the table. As the meal progressed, and we attended to our 2-year-old, they got obscured by plates and napkins.
As we were leaving the table, we saw some long-time friends at another table. My wife took our son over to visit while I paid the bill (nice tip – more than 25% because we had a coupon) and gathered our things. But I forgot my glasses.
We visited with our friends for about 5 minutes on the other side of the restaurant and went out to the car. That's when I realized that I didn't have them.
I returned to the table, which had already been cleared.
That's when it got ugly.
I found our server, and when I asked her about the glasses, she declared that they weren't on the table: "I would have seen them if they were there." She was quite defiant, and I started to regret that I had been generous with her tip.
She then asked if I had left them in the bathroom – which I hadn't visited. I had to verbally nudge her to get her to ask around in the kitchen to see if anyone else had seen them. She came back: "They're not here." She was getting impatient with me. I was getting impatient with her. I regretted tipping her at all.
I told her I was certain I left them on the table, and I wondered whether they could have been placed into the trash. Now, she looked at me with disgust. She reiterated that she would have seen the glasses "if they were there." When she saw I was serious and wasn't going to leave, she offered to talk to the manager about whether I could go through the trash.
While she was in the kitchen, I heard her declare that she wasn't going "in there" (the trash can). There were also rounds of laughter — I assumed it was at my expense. She came back, and informed me they would carry the can out to the back of the restaurant, and I could rifle through it out in the cold. She looked at me as though I had bugs crawling all over me. Now furious, I told her I'd go out there.
I pulled my car around back, and two kitchen dudes brought a couple of garbage cans out. Without saying a word to me, they plopped them down, returned to the kitchen, and slammed the door. I stood there in the cold, stunned for a few seconds as I realized that no one was going to help in the slightest — even to offer any suggestions on where to start or implements with which to sift through the trash…
Then, I remembered that I had a 24" level in the back of my car. At first, I poked and prodded through the kitchen waste with the bright yellow level. No glasses. Then I was rowing through the stuff to get deeper and deeper into the can. My son was repeating "What is Daddy doooooing?" over and over again. It must have made for a comical scene, but I was livid.
I was angry enough that I entertained the thought of emptying the trash cans all over the lot. Or, even better, the lobby! I just wanted revenge.
Then, I rowed back a piece of lettuce and found my "prize": The glasses were covered in some sort of ranch sauce, onion, and ketchup concoction. I went back to the car to get a few paper napkins, and then fished the disgusting mixture out.
I wanted to show our server — despite her absolute certainty that the glasses weren't there — that in fact, they were. So I headed around to the lobby. One of the kitchen dudes was outside the front door on his smoke break. "Did you find 'em?" "Yes," I said, holding up the messy prize. "Really? That's amazing…" I asked him to let our server know, deciding not to make a bigger confrontation out of it.
While I had gone to the front, the manager had come out briefly to talk with my wife. He went inside before I got back.
But for me, it was too little, too late. I hated Ruby Tuesday. That was two weeks ago, and I'm still peeved. Can you tell?
A Few Lessons for Business
[where: 1808 Alysheba Way, Lexington, KY 40509]
Here at Lowell's, we strive for an exceptional level of customer service. We want our customers to remember and recommend us. When they do, we grow.
In reality, we make mistakes. But we do try to learn and improve when we make them. And we try to make up for mistakes whenever possible.
Recently, we have had some, er, memorable customer experiences with other organizations. In upcoming posts, I'll document some of them. It will be quite entertaining.
In the process, I'll use three categories to talk about customer service levels:
We're going to have some fun with these posts, but we're also going to try to extract important business lessons from them.
We're also very interested in hearing about your hero, zero, or Nero customer service experiences. Comment below about your notable experiences. We can't wait to hear from you.
[where: 111 Mechanic St, Lexington, KY 40507]
I'm quite a bit different than my business-owning peers — I actually don't mind paying taxes. I get a lot of benefit from those taxes: providing for our common defense, local police and fire protection, and a pretty great infrastructure (by world standards), among many other services that our governments provide. It is my duty as a citizen to financially support the governments that protect and enable our freedoms.
I feel this way even though those services and those governments should be much more efficient and much less bureaucratic than they are. So I'm not a typical all-taxes-are-evil type of business owner…
But I hate dealing with taxes.
When I bought this business, I knew that I was going to have to deal more with taxes and payroll issues than when I was an individual employee of a corporation. (Unlike many businesses, we don't send our payroll or most of our taxes out to other professionals. Yet.)
But I totally underestimated the crushing administrative burden of the variety, frequency, and complexity of tax payments. Besides dealing with federal, state, and local governments (which I expected), I quickly learned that each entity had many different types of taxes, each with different weekly, monthly, and quarterly schedules, and each out-of-sync with the others. There were many taxes which we paid and documented on a regular basis which had to be re-documented periodically. Then, in January, the schedule gets jumbled from every other tax period. It is needlessly complicated and time-consuming.
Again, I'm a willing taxpayer (although I'd always welcome paying less). But I don't want to be a tax expert. And I don't want to be forced to hire one. And I don't want to spend so much time managing our taxes when it should be spent managing our business…
There must be a simpler way for businesses to contribute to their governments.
I have to admit I wasn't engaged in the discussions surrounding "the Dame block" and the CentrePointe development in downtown Lexington last year. I didn't frequent the places on the block, and I didn't follow the day-to-day developments as the debate raged about what to do with the block. I don't have a sentimental attachment to the issue.
But, today, two aspects of the CentrePointe project have struck me:
Only one thing is now missing from the CentrePointe development: Actual development…
The Webbs promised Lexington that CentrePointe construction was to begin in December. Now, a month later, activity is yet to begin.
The company asserts that it is waiting for various state approvals in order to begin construction. Apparently, some of that includes permission to begin blasting an even-deeper pit for the complex's parking garage. (Blasting… Sets a nice ambiance for downtown businesses like ours.)
This is an extremely poor economic and financial environment for initiating a major real
estate development project. One has to wonder: As the financial system has crumbled faster than the Dame block was demolished, do the Webbs
really have the financial horsepower (or backing – they haven't named their "private backers") to pull off a project of this
magnitude?
One also has to wonder… Why did they proceed with razing the block if they were (and are) awaiting basic approvals to begin construction? Prudence would dictate waiting until approvals were in hand.
Finally, one wonders… Who is accountable for this scar upon our city if, perchance, the unnamed Webb financers do back out? CentrePit, indeed.
Update, 1/24: CentrePointe is supposed to house a J.W. Marriott hotel. This morning, this bit of sunshine from NPR, including the following:
Still, it's hard for many businesses and people who don't have the very best credit ratings to get loans.
Arne Sorenson is the chief financial officer of the hotel corporation Marriott International.
"There are clear signs of improvement, I think," he says, "not withstanding that there is an abhorrence of risk."
Sorenson
says it's still almost impossible to get funding for new hotels, even
for low-risk projects that he says make sense right now. He says banks
just aren't lending enough money. And that hurts the economy.
At
Marriott alone, he said, "there are thousands of jobs that are not
being created that normally would be created. And that's entirely due
to the lack of credit available to fund new hotel projects."
[where: E Main St & N Limestone St, Lexington, KY 40507]
The Baltimore Sun reports that the economic slump has dried up the market for stolen vehicles and parts (especially when coupled with more sophisticated ignition systems). As a result, car theft in Baltimore has dropped some 25% in the past two years.
Business is tough. Even for the criminals.
[where: Baltimore, MD]
In 2008, Toyota became the largest carmaker in the world, producing nearly 9 million vehicles. Toyota surpassed General Motors, who had held that title for 77 years, by over 600,000 vehicles.
As Toyota specialists, we're pleased. As lifelong fans of GM, we're also a little sad.
Both manufacturers downplayed the significance of Toyota's ascension to the top of the sales charts, which is the culmination of a decades-long steady climb by Toyota and a precipitous drops by GM, especially in the past year.
While GM executives are optimistic about a return to the top spot, the Lowell's Corporate Office of Fearless Predictions says that won't happen. Toyota will remain #1 for the next 20 years or more.
As we've noted before, GM and the other Detroit automakers have structural disadvantages in their business design relative to Japanese automakers which their executives have been either unwilling or unable to decisively address.
Meanwhile, Toyota has historically invested in new technologies and new capabilities long before the market demanded them, and stood ready to take advantage of sudden shifts in market demand.
Toyota isn't always right — they released their huge 2008 Tundra and Sequoia models right into the teeth of $4 gas — but they almost always put themselves in position to be right. With gas prices lower, their big models may get some traction, especially against similar GM, Ford, and Dodge models. When gas prices shoot back up, they can rely on the Prius and their other hybrid models to continue their market gains.
Toyota consistently makes collections of bets which advantage the company relative to its competitors. When those bets don't work out (witness the Tundra), the Detroit 3 suffers more than Toyota (witness the sudden implosion of Detroit's truck-heavy business). And the other bets Toyota makes (like hybrid, solar, and electric vehicle techologies) more than compensate for the ones that don't succeed.
That's why Toyota will stay in the top spot.
Once in a while, we get a chance to do something which does good for our community while also doing well for ourselves.
We've found such an opportunity with public radio. We've long admired the quality reporting and programming of National Public Radio and our local public radio stations.
So we are pleased to announce that Lowell's is the newest underwriter for WUKY 91.3 FM, public radio at the University of Kentucky. Our first of many underwriting announcements (kind of like an ad spot) will run at 7:09 AM on Morning Edition. Other announcements will run on All Things Considered, Marketplace, and (a personal favorite) Car Talk. (You might remember our post a few weeks ago about Lowell's on Car Talk.)
We are also proud to announce that Lowell's is the first underwriter of WUKY's HD Radio programming. WUKY is the first station in Lexington to offer HD programming, and has 3 separate HD broadcasts which you can hear with an HD radio, or via webstream:
We are proud to sponsor listener-supported public radio. Please listen with us!